‘Mid-Acts-ers’ boldly claim that they have ‘no part at all’ in the book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ, as it is recorded by John:
Rev 1:1-3 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
2 Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of all things that he saw.
3 Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time is at hand.
‘Mid-Acts-ers’ deny new Jerusalem being their mother .... even though Paul declares it .... because new Jerusalem is in the book of the Revelation (Rev 3:12, 21:2).
What if God gives the ‘mid-Acts-ers’ what they want?
‘No part’ in new Jerusalem?
Gal 4:26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
‘Mid-Acts-ers’ boldly claim that James, Cephas (Peter), and John wrote only to the circumcision (Israel) and not to the Gentiles (based on Gal 2:9).
“The testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.” (Rev 19:10b). ‘Mid-Acts-ers’ think they have no part in the book of Revelation. They want nothing to do with the book of Revelation:
Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
What if God gives the ‘mid-Acts-ers’ what they want?
‘No part’ of the book of this prophecy .... and thus, no part in the book of life?
This is David Dowell saying, “Think about it!”
